SBB StaBiKat - results/titledata

Intro -- Contents -- Endorsements -- About the Authors -- Foreword -- 1 Classical Liberalism as A New Third Way -- Transcending a Dichotomy -- Classical Liberalism's Distinctiveness -- What is Classical Liberalism? -- Classical Liberalism Challenges the Single Power Principle, which Most Take for Granted -- Classical liberalism as a unique worldview in the world -- Structure of the Book -- Part 1: Challenging Technocratic Governance -- Part 2: Challenging Emerging Progressive, Leftist Advocacy -- 2 Asian Values and Classical Liberalism -- Singapore, Asian Values, and the Aversion to Liberalism -- On the Dogmatic Insistence of Democracy and Human Rights for Developing Nations -- On Western Hypocrisy and Policy Failures -- Foreign Policy -- Economic Practices -- On Socio-economic Problems in Western Society -- Asian Culture and Classical Liberalism -- Three Schools of Political Thought in Ancient China -- Singapore's System -- Confucianism and Market Liberalism -- Daoist Classical Liberalism -- Asian Values, Culture, and Epistemic Liberalism -- Response -- Conclusion -- 3 Meritocracy and Elitism in Singapore: What Both Sides Get Wrong About the Debate on Meritocracy -- Meritocracy in Singapore -- The PAP's Rhetoric of Meritocracy -- A Meritocratic Public Policy -- Is Singapore a True Meritocracy? -- What Both Sides Get Wrong -- Response to Starting Line Argument: Why Meritocracies are Incompatible with a Market Economy -- Response to "Politically Defined" Argument: There is No "Fix" to Meritocracy -- State-defined meritocracy leads to rent-seeking -- People cannot pursue what meritocracy means to them -- Knowledge problem relating to meritocracy -- Classical Liberalism as a Solution to Resolve Tensions in Singapore's Meritocracy -- Conclusion -- 4 Singapore's Technocratic Paternalism and How Behavioural Economics Justifies More of the Same.